- Company
- Products & Services
- Technical Information
- Customer Service
- Resource Center
- Airspeed Indicators
- Altimeters
- Annunciation Control Units
- Attitude Indicators
- Autopilots
- Batteries
- Carburetor Temperature Indicators and Probes
- Clocks
- Converters
- Custom Function Displays
- Directional Gyros
- Emergency Locator Transmitters
- Encoders
- Engine Instruments
- GPS Antenna
- GPS Receivers
- Ground Power Units
- Horizontal Situation Indicators
- Installation Hardware
- Inverters
- Lighting
- Nav/Comms
- Navigation Indicators
- Outlets
- Rate Gyroscopes
- Relay Units
- Standby Attitude Modules
- Transponders
- Turn and Slip Indicators
- Turn Coordinators
- USB Charging Ports
- Vertical Speed Indicators
- Airspeed Indicators
- Altimeters
- Altitude Holds, Selectors and Alerters
- Amplifiers, Power Supplies and Converters
- Annunciation Control Units
- Attitude Indicators
- Audio Panel/Marker Beacon Receivers
- Batteries
- Carburetor Temperature Indicators and Probes
- Clocks
- Computer Amplifiers
- Directional Gyros
- Emergency Locator Transmitters
- Encoders
- Engine Instruments
- Flight Computers and Controllers
- Flight Directors
- Flux Detectors
- GPS Receivers
- Horizontal Situation Indicators
- Lighting
- Miscellaneous Indicators
- Nav/Comms
- Navigation Indicators
- Radar Transmitters
- Rate Gyroscopes
- Relay Units
- Remote Gyro Systems
- Servos and Actuators
- Standby Attitude Modules
- Transponders
- Turn and Slip Indicators
- Turn Coordinators
- Vertical Speed Indicators
Sign up today
Want the latest news, product updates and promotions?
Round Dial vs. Glass Cockpit: Which is Better?

April 8, 2020
Round dials in a cockpit, also called analog gauges, have been standard in aircraft since the early days of aviation. Glass cockpits, or electronic flight instrument systems, began appearing in commercial aircraft in the late 1990s, and by 2003 they were starting to appear in general aviation airplanes.
Most general aviation aircraft can be ordered with glass cockpits, and older aircraft can be retrofitted to take advantage of the new technology.
Which is best? We'll take a look at the differences between a glass cockpit and an analog cockpit.
Glass Cockpit vs. Analog Cockpit
In a round dial cockpit, the six-pack of gauges — attitude, airspeed indicator, altimeter, turn coordinator, heading indicator and vertical speed indicator — are the core flight instruments. Navigation is managed via enroute charts.
In a glass cockpit, the main flight instruments are consolidated into a digital primary flight display (PFD). While some of the instruments will look familiar, others, such as the airspeed indicator and altimeter, are transformed from dials into digital tape displays. A second multifunction display (MFD) features a moving map and other information, such as weather (if the aircraft is so equipped).
Here are some differences between the two types of cockpit systems:
Glass Cockpit | Original Cockpit | |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use | Information displayed on one screen No need to reset headings Training required to understand all the functions and controls Controls are not standardized across manufacturers | Pilot must scan six instruments Heading indicator needs to be reset every 15 mins depending on type Instruments are universal across aircraft types More mechanical parts |
Reliability | Proven reliability Dependent on electrical power and software stability Requires backup instruments | Instruments require regular maintenance and overhaul Can fail due to vacuum or electrical failures Instruments can function during loss of electrical power |
Flexibility | Displays can be custom configured Engine performance displays can be integrated to reduce pilot workload | Each instrument performs a single function |
Redundancy | In case of PFD failure, functions can be transferred to the MFD Glass cockpits often have backup attitude, airspeed and altimeter instruments Aircraft with dual ADC and AHRS have full redundancy | Pilots must know failure modes and resolutions for each instrument Backups must use independent vacuum/static/electrical systems |
Visibility | Doesn't suffer from parallax view from the right seat Colors on panel make it easier to distinguish important information | Round dials can be difficult to read from the right seat due to distance and parallax Gauges can provide quick updates without focusing on exact numbers |
Alerts | Visual and aural annunciations and warnings are standard for airspeed, altitude and others | You can set bugs on the altimeter and heading indicators for reminders |
Weather | ADS-B and XM weather provide forecasts, radar reports, etc. | Radar capability requires additional systems and hardware |
Connectivity | Bluetooth connectivity for uploading flight plans, cockpit communication and entertainment | Analog instruments don't connect to Bluetooth or other technology |
Traffic Avoidance | Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADB-S) traffic awareness helps prevent incidents | Additional hardware required for Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADB-S) functionality |
Cost | Higher initial cost, lower ongoing maintenance | Lower initial cost, regular maintenance and overhauls required |
Contact Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics
Analog gauges have served aircraft well for decades and will do so for years to come. But the power, reliability and flexibility of glass cockpits make them an easy choice for most aircraft today. If you're looking for reduced pilot workload and better performance on information displayed, it may be time to make the switch to a glass cockpit.
You can replace some individual instruments with a digital counterpart. For more information on analog and digital instruments, contact Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics. Mid-Continent provides superior instruments, avionics and power solutions to the global aerospace industry. Our expertise transcends five decades of manufacturing safe and certified products through the deployment of innovative technologies and the development of sophisticated, clean-sheet designs. Contact us today.